Comments on: Soft Language http://gameqablog.com/2008/05/soft-language.html And you thought your Quality Assurance staff were illiterate Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:55:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Russell Jenkins http://gameqablog.com/2008/05/soft-language.html#comment-8656 Russell Jenkins Thu, 22 May 2008 16:52:25 +0000 http://gameqablog.com/?p=137#comment-8656 You hit the nail on the head. This is a good portion of the reason why I am seriously considering leaving QA for good and going into IT. When you solve problems in IT, people actually thank you. Software QA only identifies the problem and a significant poriotn of developers think that is horrible to have the problem pointed out. However, if they would learn to identify their own BUGS, there wouldn't be a need for testers. Ironic isn't it? *sigh* You stated what the core problem is very well. You hit the nail on the head. This is a good portion of the reason why I am seriously considering leaving QA for good and going into IT. When you solve problems in IT, people actually thank you. Software QA only identifies the problem and a significant poriotn of developers think that is horrible to have the problem pointed out. However, if they would learn to identify their own BUGS, there wouldn’t be a need for testers. Ironic isn’t it? *sigh*

You stated what the core problem is very well.

]]> By: Unsolved Mysteries: Guest Writers | Game QA Blog http://gameqablog.com/2008/05/soft-language.html#comment-8581 Unsolved Mysteries: Guest Writers | Game QA Blog Mon, 19 May 2008 07:51:20 +0000 http://gameqablog.com/?p=137#comment-8581 [...] to note that the first actual guest post is up, again, much respect and many thanks to Michael Russell, and now I’ve turned bylines [...] [...] to note that the first actual guest post is up, again, much respect and many thanks to Michael Russell, and now I’ve turned bylines [...]

]]>