<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Game QA Blog &#187; wiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gameqablog.com/category/wiki/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gameqablog.com</link>
	<description>And you thought your Quality Assurance staff were illiterate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Glub Glub Mo Cast</title>
		<link>http://gameqablog.com/2006/08/glub-glub-mo-cast.html</link>
		<comments>http://gameqablog.com/2006/08/glub-glub-mo-cast.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[expectedresult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gameqablog.com/wp/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re interested I&#8217;ve just started another venture with regard to Linux and a wee bit of testing talk thrown in. The Linux Games Dot Com podcast. I&#8217;ve also tried listening to a number of QA podcasts recently and they are apparently universally boring. Could these people sound more uninterested in the subject they&#8217;re covering? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://gameqablog.com/img/scrns/lg_pcst_scrn2.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://gameqablog.com/img/scrns/lg_pcst_scrn2.png" alt="" border="0" /></a>If you&#8217;re interested I&#8217;ve just started another venture with regard to Linux and a wee bit of testing talk thrown in. <a href="http://linuxgames.com/news/feedback.php?identiferID=8604&amp;action=flatview">The Linux Games Dot Com podcast</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also tried listening to a number of QA podcasts recently and they are apparently universally boring. Could these people sound more uninterested in the subject they&#8217;re covering? I realize non-game QA might be less interesting. At least these people speak clearer than I do. However, they&#8217;re so incredibly dull. I&#8217;ll keep trying, maybe I&#8217;m just listening to off weeks for them. Not linking to any in particular since I don&#8217;t want to offend their creators who have obviously spent a significant amount of time creating their podcasts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d do a Game QA podcast experiment if only I had some more people to do it with and a better idea of what to discuss.</p>
<p>It has at least been incredibly interesting doing the audio editing for this project, and it also got me to check out <a href="http://www.gameqablog.com/2006/08/quick-wiki-roundup.html">the latest state of phpwiki</a>. Which I&#8217;d been meaning to do for some months now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gameqablog.com/2006/08/glub-glub-mo-cast.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Wiki Roundup</title>
		<link>http://gameqablog.com/2006/08/quick-wiki-roundup.html</link>
		<comments>http://gameqablog.com/2006/08/quick-wiki-roundup.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actualresult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gameqablog.com/wp/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use wiki software in practically everything I do. One of the problems with this kind of software is that (and this is why this is a quick roundup) because Wikipedia runs the Media Wiki software. WIkipedia running Media Wiki is an unintentional problem, kind of like the slashdot effect, but for development. You see, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://gameqablog.com/img/scrns/mediawiki.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 500px;" src="http://gameqablog.com/img/scrns/mediawiki.png" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />I use wiki software in practically everything I do. One of the problems with this kind of software is that (and this is why this is a quick roundup) because Wikipedia runs <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/">the Media Wiki software</a>.</p>
<p>WIkipedia running Media Wiki is an unintentional problem, kind of like the slashdot effect, but for development. You see, since they use Media Wiki software, and they&#8217;re the most popular wiki, the most development gets spent on Media Wiki&#8230;</p>
<p>So today I go and set up a quick <a href="http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/">PHP Wiki</a>, and it hasn&#8217;t changed in a year practically. This is the effect I&#8217;m talking about, no significant changes in a YEAR. This is ridiculous, I&#8217;m going to check out any other quick wikis that don&#8217;t require databases and see if they&#8217;re sufferring the Wikipedia effect too.</p>
<p>Oh and, for what it is worth, I don&#8217;t hate Wikipedia. I actually <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TimeDoctor">do some editing there</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gameqablog.com/2006/08/quick-wiki-roundup.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
